From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Felong

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1664 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

257 KA 15-02013

03-26-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher M. FELONG, Defendant-Appellant.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LISA GRAY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LISA GRAY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by reversing that part convicting defendant of assault in the second degree and dismissing count two of the indictment, and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of assault on a police officer ( Penal Law § 120.08 ), assault in the second degree (§ 120.05 [3]), unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree (§ 165.06), resisting arrest (§ 205.30), and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree ( Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [2] [a] [i] ). The charges arose from an incident in which defendant, who was operating a stolen vehicle, fled from a traffic stop and one of the responding officers injured his knee when he jumped over a fence while pursuing him.

Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of assault on a police officer as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ), we conclude that the verdict on that count is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v. Bleakley , 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). We reject defendant's contention that the conviction of assault on a police officer is against the weight of the evidence with respect to the element of causation. Where, as here, a defendant's flight "naturally induces a police officer to engage in pursuit, and the officer is killed [or injured] in the course of that pursuit, the causation element of the crime will be satisfied" ( People v. Britt , 132 A.D.3d 1254, 1254, 16 N.Y.S.3d 881 [4th Dept. 2015], lv denied 26 N.Y.3d 1108, 26 N.Y.S.3d 766, 47 N.E.3d 96 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v. Carncross , 14 N.Y.3d 319, 325, 901 N.Y.S.2d 112, 927 N.E.2d 532 [2010] ; People v. Cipollina , 94 A.D.3d 1549, 1550, 943 N.Y.S.2d 710 [4th Dept. 2012], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 971, 950 N.Y.S.2d 354, 973 N.E.2d 764 [2012] ). We likewise reject defendant's contention that the conviction of assault on a police officer is against the weight of the evidence with respect to the element of serious physical injury. " ‘Serious physical injury’ means physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes death or serious and protracted disfigurement, protracted impairment of health or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ" ( Penal Law § 10.00 [10] ). Here, the credible evidence established that the officer's injury required arthroscopic knee surgery to reconstruct the ACL as well as a partial lateral meniscectomy ; that the officer was completely disabled for almost 10 months; and that, at the time of trial two years after the incident, his range of motion remained restricted and he was no longer able to participate in certain activities. Based on that evidence, the jury was justified in finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer suffered a serious physical injury (see People v. Hilton , 166 A.D.3d 1316, 1318-1319, 87 N.Y.S.3d 399 [3d Dept. 2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 1205, 99 N.Y.S.3d 248, 122 N.E.3d 1160 [2019] ; see also People v. Johnson , 50 A.D.3d 1537, 1538, 856 N.Y.S.2d 781 [4th Dept. 2008], lv denied 10 N.Y.3d 935, 862 N.Y.S.2d 342, 892 N.E.2d 408 [2008] ; see generally Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d at 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ).

We agree with defendant, however, that assault in the second degree is an inclusory concurrent count of assault on a police officer. Counts are concurrent when "concurrent sentences only may be imposed in case of conviction thereon," and such counts "are ‘inclusory’ when the offense charged in one is greater than any of those charged in the others and when the latter are all lesser offenses included within the greater" ( CPL 300.30 [3], [4] ). Here, concurrent sentencing was required inasmuch as the same conduct formed the basis of each count (see People v. Couser , 28 N.Y.3d 368, 375-376, 45 N.Y.S.3d 301, 68 N.E.3d 26 [2016] ) and, as charged here, assault in the second degree is a lesser included offense of assault on a police officer (see CPL 1.20 [37] ; see generally People v. Glover , 57 N.Y.2d 61, 63-64, 453 N.Y.S.2d 660, 439 N.E.2d 376 [1982] ). Thus, that part of the judgment convicting defendant of assault in the second degree must be reversed and count two of the indictment dismissed (see People v. Box , 181 A.D.3d 1238, 1242-1243, 119 N.Y.S.3d 650 [4th Dept. 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1025, 126 N.Y.S.3d 24, 149 N.E.3d 862 [2020], cert denied ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S.Ct. 1099, 208 L.Ed.2d 548 [2021] ), and we therefore modify the judgment accordingly.

The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We note, however, that the certificate of conviction incorrectly reflects that defendant was convicted of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, and it therefore must be amended to reflect that defendant was convicted of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree (see People v. Cooper , 136 A.D.3d 1397, 1398, 24 N.Y.S.3d 481 [4th Dept. 2016], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 1067, 38 N.Y.S.3d 838, 60 N.E.3d 1204 [2016] ).


Summaries of

People v. Felong

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 26, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1664 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Felong

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher M. FELONG…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 26, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 1664 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
144 N.Y.S.3d 515

Citing Cases

People v. Felong

Disposition: Applications for Criminal Leave to appeal denied Decision Reported Below: 4th Dept: 192 A.D.3d…

People v. Brown

Additionally, given the relative strength of the victims’ identifications, and the corroborating…