From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Felong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2001
283 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Filed May 2, 2001.

Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Geraci, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, WISNER, SCUDDER AND BURNS, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25) and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 110.00, 155.30). Defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to dismiss a juror after the juror reported to the court that she recognized a prosecution witness as a friend of her mother. By failing to object to the manner in which the court investigated whether the juror should be dismissed as grossly unqualified, defendant has failed to preserve his contention for our review ( see, People v. Albert, 85 N.Y.2d 851, 852). In any event, that contention is without merit. The juror unequivocally stated that her limited association with the witness would not affect her ability to consider the evidence impartially ( see, People v. Brantley, 168 A.D.2d 949, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 904).

The court properly denied defendant's request to subpoena the psychiatric records of a key prosecution witness. "Confidential psychiatric records should be disclosed `only when their confidentiality is significantly outweighed by the interests of justice'" ( People v. Toledo, 270 A.D.2d 805, 806, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 858, quoting People v. Brooks, 199 A.D.2d 275, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 922; see, Mental Hygiene Law § 33.13 [c] [1]), and defendant's allegation that the records could impact upon the credibility of the witness failed to meet that test. We have considered defendant's remaining contentions with respect to the court's denial of defendant's request for the subpoena and conclude that they are without merit. The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495).


Summaries of

People v. Felong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2001
283 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Felong

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANK FELONG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 2, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 380

Citing Cases

People v. Lack

The court properly refused to order disclosure of the victim's confidential psychiatric records. Those…

People v. Tirado

We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in denying his request for access to the mental…