From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Federal Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 12, 1906
114 App. Div. 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

July 12, 1906.

D. Cady Herrick, for the appellants.

Charles F. Bostwick, for the respondent.

Present — O'BRIEN, P.J., PATTERSON, McLAUGHLIN, LAUGHLIN and HOUGHTON, JJ.


It would seem from the course of the trial before the referee that it was practically stipulated that the claimants' compensation should be fixed at $20,000. The People, represented by the Attorney-General, and the claimants were the only parties to the reference. Any stipulation they may have made the Special Term could not disturb while it remained in force. This being so, the action of the Special Term in reducing that amount to $15,000 was unwarranted. The order appealed from should be reversed and the report of the referee confirmed, without costs.


Order reversed and report of referee confirmed, without costs. Order filed.


Summaries of

People v. Federal Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 12, 1906
114 App. Div. 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

People v. Federal Bank

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . THE FEDERAL BANK OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1906

Citations

114 App. Div. 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
100 N.Y.S. 44