From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Faulkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 30, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Summary

vacating sentence on ground that defendant who disputed a factual assertion relevant to sentencing should have been given an opportunity to refute that assertion at a presentence conference

Summary of this case from Hili v. Sciarrotta

Opinion

April 30, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.).


Defendant was indicted and charged with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. He pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree pursuant to an agreement by which he would be granted youthful offender treatment and sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant was released on his own recognizance pending sentencing and the promised disposition was made contingent upon his reporting back to court for sentencing; if defendant was arrested prior to sentencing on a Penal Law violation, the agreed-to disposition would be nullified and he would be subject to a harsher sentence.

On the date of sentencing it appeared that defendant had been arrested and indicted for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree. Defense counsel responded that defendant pleaded not guilty to that charge, that he maintained his innocence, that his arrest was completely out of his control and that he had not done anything. County Court disregarded those statements and, based upon the subsequent arrest, denied defendant youthful offender treatment and sentenced him to an indeterminate prison term of 4 to 12 years. Defendant appeals.

The sentence must be vacated. When defendant disputed the validity of the subsequent arrest and criminal charge, County Court should have afforded him the opportunity to refute the subsequent charge at a presentence conference (see, People v Banks, 161 A.D.2d 957, 957-958).

Weiss, P.J., Mikoll and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Albany County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court's decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Faulkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 30, 1992
182 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

vacating sentence on ground that defendant who disputed a factual assertion relevant to sentencing should have been given an opportunity to refute that assertion at a presentence conference

Summary of this case from Hili v. Sciarrotta
Case details for

People v. Faulkner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERRY FAULKNER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 1025 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 542

Citing Cases

People v. Outley

Nothing in the decisions of our State courts or of the Federal courts calls for such an onerous rule and we…

People v. McGirt

The sentencing court must assure itself that the information upon which it bases the sentence is reliable and…