From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fata

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2023
220 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

2022–08996 Ind. No. 70042/22

10-18-2023

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Malik FATA, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant. Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), for respondent.

BETSY BARROS, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, WILLIAM G. FORD, HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lisa Grey, J.), imposed October 13, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, FORD and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fata

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 2023
220 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Fata

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Malik Fata, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 2023

Citations

220 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5271
196 N.Y.S.3d 571