From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fasano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 29, 1985
107 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 29, 1985

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Gorman, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Boomer, Green, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and new trial granted. Memorandum: The jury convicted defendant of assault in the second degree (Penal Law, § 120.05, subd 2) as charged in the indictment. At trial, defendant requested that assault in the third degree, under subdivision 3 of section 120.00 Penal of the Penal Law, be charged as a lesser included offense. The trial court erroneously denied the request, and we reverse.

The evidence demonstrated that defendant, piqued by his then-seven-year-old son's behavior, picked up the child by his arms and shoulders and pounded him feet first against the floor several times. As a result the child suffered a fracture of the left tibia.

The District Attorney concedes on appeal that it is theoretically impossible to commit assault in the second degree under subdivision 2 of section 120.05 Penal of the Penal Law without at the same time committing assault in the third degree under subdivision 1 of section 120.00 Penal of the Penal Law (see People v Fugaro, 96 A.D.2d 659; People v. Mena, 70 A.D.2d 550) and subdivision 3 of that section (see People v. Green, 56 N.Y.2d 427, mot for rearg den 57 N.Y.2d 775; People v. Stanfield, 36 N.Y.2d 467), and that, therefore, assault in the third degree is a lesser included offense (CPL 1.20, subd 37). It is argued, however, that there is no reasonable view of the evidence that would support a finding that the defendant committed the lesser offense but did not commit the greater offense (see People v. Glover, 57 N.Y.2d 61). We disagree. On this record, the jury could reasonably have found that defendant was guilty of assault in the third degree under any one of the three subdivisions of section 120.00 Penal of the Penal Law (see, e.g., People v. Hall, 56 N.Y.2d 547; People v. Mena, supra; see, also, People v. Green, supra).

We have reviewed the other issues raised by defendant on appeal and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Fasano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 29, 1985
107 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Fasano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL FASANO, SR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 1052 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant preserved for our review each of the grounds that he now advances on…

People v. Scahill

On appeal, he argues that the court erred by refusing his request to charge both reckless and negligent…