From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1994
209 A.D.2d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 16, 1994

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Marks, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Fallon, Wesley and Doerr, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree is supported by legally sufficient evidence. The evidence adduced at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621), establishes that defendant obtained a donation of beer by misrepresenting that it would be used for a charitable event sponsored by the Greece Police Department, and that he then appropriated the beer for his own use and benefit.

Defendant failed to preserve for review the issue whether the court erred in failing to read-back the cross-examination testimony of a prosecution witness (see, People v. Merrill, 169 A.D.2d 997, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 909). Were we to reach the merits of that issue, we would find no error. The jury indicated that it did not wish to hear any further testimony (cf., People v Berger, 188 A.D.2d 1073, 1074, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 881).


Summaries of

People v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1994
209 A.D.2d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Farrell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD FARRELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 1020 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 442

Citing Cases

People v. Hogan

Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Farrell, 209 A.D.2d…

People v. Coleman

We also reject defendant's contention that the court committed reversible error in failing to read back the…