In People v. Fanning (131 N.Y. 659, 663) it was thus written by Judge PECKHAM on the subject of marshalling the evidence by the judge in his charge in words which we think are sufficiently pertinent to render any comment unnecessary.
Summary of this case from People v. BeckerArgued March 9, 1892
Decided March 22, 1892
Louis Meyer for appellant.
H.B.B. Stapler for respondent.
PECKHAM, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In People v. Fanning (131 N.Y. 659, 663) it was thus written by Judge PECKHAM on the subject of marshalling the evidence by the judge in his charge in words which we think are sufficiently pertinent to render any comment unnecessary.
Summary of this case from People v. BeckerIn People v. Fanning (131 N.Y. 659, 663) Judge PECKHAM said: "In a criminal case we think the judge has the right, and indeed it is his duty to present the evidence to the jury in such light and with such comments that the jury may see its relevancy and pertinency to the particular issue upon which it was admitted, and thus be better qualified to appreciate its character and weight and to determine its credibility.
Summary of this case from People v. BuccolaFull title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . HENRY C. FANNING…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 22, 1892
In his extended remarks concerning the witness Rose and which seem to us to have assumed somewhat the form of…
People v. Zigouras(Code of Criminal Procedure, section 542.) This statute has been frequently invoked in cases where the…