People v. Fanfair

2 Citing cases

  1. People v. Foxworth

    197 A.D.2d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 2 times

    The defendant's contentions that he was prejudiced by the prosecutor's remarks and questioning during cross-examination and by his summation are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953), are without merit (see, People v. Chaitin, 61 N.Y.2d 683, 684; People v. Fanfair, 176 A.D.2d 958; People v. Shuff, 168 A.D.2d 348), or involve harmless error (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). The defendant also contends that the court's charge as to identification was inadequate.

  2. People v. Mendez

    191 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)   Cited 2 times

    The defendant's remaining contentions regarding alleged improper comments by the prosecutor during summation are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Rosado, 143 A.D.2d 1061, 1062), and, in any event, do not warrant a new trial (see, People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230; People v. Fanfair, 176 A.D.2d 958; People v. Rosado, supra). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.