From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Faneytt

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Jul 3, 2024
212 N.Y.S.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

07-03-2024

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tahiris FANEYTT, appellant.

Randall D. Unger, Kew Gardens, NY, for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.


Randall D. Unger, Kew Gardens, NY, for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill and Danielle S. Fenn of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.

BETSY BARROS, J.P, PAUL WOOTEN, BARRY E. WARHIT, JANICE A. TAYLOR, LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Peter F. Vallone, Jr., J.), imposed October 4, 2023, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

BARROS, J.P., WOOTEN, WARHIT, TAYLOR and LOVE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Faneytt

New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Jul 3, 2024
212 N.Y.S.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

People v. Faneytt

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tahiris FANEYTT, appellant.

Court:New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Date published: Jul 3, 2024

Citations

212 N.Y.S.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)