Opinion
December 29, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Rettinger, J.).
The evidence was legally sufficient to support the possession charge. The totality of the evidence, including the undercover officer's conversations between herself and defendant, along with her testimony about the interplay between defendant and the codefendant, provided ample evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer defendant's possession of the drugs in question under the theory of accessorial liability and reject the claim that these drugs should be attributed solely to the codefendant ( see, People v. Luquis, 254 A.D.2d 113; People v. Gonzalez, 247 A.D.2d 332, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 973).
The court's limitation on defendant's summation did not unduly restrict his ability to present his defense.
Concur — Lerner, P. J., Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.