From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Faison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 6, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The hearing court's finding that defendant's confession was knowingly and voluntarily made is entitled to great weight (see, People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761) and is supported by the record (see, People v Adams, 26 N.Y.2d 129, 137, cert denied 399 U.S. 931; cf., People v Schompert, 19 N.Y.2d 300, 305). The record also supports the jury determination that defendant's intoxication, if any, did not negate her intent on the weapon possession count. The assault conviction was not based on defendant's intent but upon her reckless conduct, which encompasses the risks created by defendant's drinking (see, People v Register, 60 N.Y.2d 270, 280, cert denied 466 U.S. 953). The evidence clearly supports the jury determination that defendant's assault was not justified. Justification is not a defense to illegal weapon possession (see, People v Pons, 68 N.Y.2d 264).


Summaries of

People v. Faison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Faison

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTINE FAISON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Ressler

Thus, the court erred in determining that such evidence was limited to negating only the element of intent.…