Opinion
June 10, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that the court erred by denying, without a hearing, that branch of his omnibus motion which was for suppression of physical evidence. The defendant's moving papers failed to allege sufficient facts to support a legal basis for the branch of his motion in question (see, CPL 710.60; People v. Mendoza, 82 N.Y.2d 415; People v. Chavous, 204 A.D.2d 475).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951) and, in any event, are without merit (see, People v Byrd, 214 A.D.2d 581). Miller, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.