From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Every

Court of Appeals of New York
Sep 5, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 6401 (N.Y. 2017)

Opinion

No. 133 SSM 20

09-05-2017

The People & c., Respondent, v. Douglas R. Every, Appellant.

Submitted by William T. Easton, for appellant. Submitted by Kirk O. Martin, for respondent.


Submitted by William T. Easton, for appellant.

Submitted by Kirk O. Martin, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant has failed to meet his burden of "demonstrat[ing] the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations for counsel's alleged failure[s]" (People v Wragg, 26 NY3d 403, 409 [2015]) and, thus, he cannot prevail on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. His assertions that County Court erred in charging the jury and deprived him of his constitutional right to present a defense by excluding certain evidence are unpreserved (see People v Angelo, 88 NY2d 217, 222 [1996]; People v Autry, 75 NY2d 836, 839 [1990]). Defendant's remaining arguments have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided September 5, 2017


Summaries of

People v. Every

Court of Appeals of New York
Sep 5, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 6401 (N.Y. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Every

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Douglas R. Every, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Sep 5, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 6401 (N.Y. 2017)