From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1999
267 A.D.2d 14 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 2, 1999

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J., at suppression hearing; Martin Marcus, J., at plea and sentence).

Kimberly T. Morgan, for respondent.

Harold V. Ferguson, Jr., for defendant-appellant.

SULLIVAN, J.P., WILLIAMS, WALLACH, LERNER, SAXE, JJ.


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. We see no reason to disturb the court's credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. The protective sweep of the apartment by the police was justified because there were specific, articulable facts to justify a reasonable belief by the police that other persons might be present in the apartment who could pose a threat to safety, or destroy evidence (see, People v. Febus, 157 A.D.2d 380, appeal dismissed 77 N.Y.2d 835), in that defendant threw a pistol into the apartment, and the police had reason to believe that the apartment was the residence of someone other than defendant.

The consecutive sentences were lawfully imposed, and we perceived no abuse of discretion in sentencing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 2, 1999
267 A.D.2d 14 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN EVANS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 14 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 351

Citing Cases

People v. Tyrell

In addition, it appeared that some of those who exited were minors. It was therefore prudent to send in…

People v. Fray

In the progeny which followed in New York, the Buie rule has been extended to allow a protective sweep where…