From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Espinal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 24, 2000

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated October 11, 1994 (People v. Espinal, 208 A.D.2d 644 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 29, 1991.

Carol Kahn, New York, N.Y. for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roseann B. MacKechnie, Michael Gore, Karol B. Magnum of counsel), for respondent.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN and GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 ).


Summaries of

People v. Espinal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Espinal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. RAMON ESPINAL, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 738