From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Esparragoza

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 9, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 145 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2016-526 RI CR

08-09-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hansel ESPARRAGOZA, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Patricia Pazner of counsel), for appellant. Richmond County District Attorney (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.


Appellate Advocates (Patricia Pazner of counsel), for appellant.

Richmond County District Attorney (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, J.P., MICHAEL L. PESCE, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ

ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

ALIOTTA, J.P., PESCE and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Esparragoza

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 9, 2019
64 Misc. 3d 145 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Esparragoza

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hansel Esparragoza…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Aug 9, 2019

Citations

64 Misc. 3d 145 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51304
117 N.Y.S.3d 433