From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Escobedo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2004
7 A.D.3d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-02518.

Decided May 3, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered February 27, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Brian G. Cesaratto, P.C., White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Kieran T. Byrne and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal does not encompass his contention that ineffective assistance of counsel affected the voluntariness of his plea ( see People v. Demosthene, 2 A.D.3d 874; People v. Active Appliance Corp., 307 A.D.2d 932, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 640, cert denied US, 124 S Ct 1714; People v. Miller, 306 A.D.2d 294; People v. Herring, 274 A.D.2d 525). However, the defendant's claim that his plea was involuntary is unpreserved for appellate review because he never moved to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Thompson, 4 A.D.3d 785; People v. Vatore, 303 A.D.2d 607; People v. Patterson, 290 A.D.2d 568; People v. Negron, 286 A.D.2d 824). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that defense counsel's performance at the Wade hearing ( see United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218) satisfied the meaningful representation standard ( see People v. Ellis, 81 N.Y.2d 854; People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137), and did not affect the voluntariness of the defendant's plea ( see People v. Williams, 305 A.D.2d 1023; People v. Lebrun, 234 A.D.2d 392).

KRAUSMAN, J.P., LUCIANO, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Escobedo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2004
7 A.D.3d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Escobedo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. IVAN OTTO ESCOBEDO, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 539 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 594

Citing Cases

People v. Sherrill

The defendant's contention that the sentence imposed constituted cruel and unusual punishment ( see US Const,…

People v. Garcia-Santo

However, as the People correctly respond, review of this issue is precluded by the defendant's effective…