From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Erazo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1999
263 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued May 24, 1999

July 6, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered June 4, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Elizabeth J. Miller of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicoletta J. Caferri, and Roni C. Piplani of counsel), for respondent.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's argument, his sentence was not excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining arguments are without merit ( see, 22 NYCRR 670.6[a]; People v. Wright, 56 N.Y.2d 613; Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335; People v. Adams, 247 A.D.2d 819).


Summaries of

People v. Erazo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 1999
263 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Erazo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. FELIBERTO ERAZO, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 908