From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ellis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 20, 2000
274 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

July 20, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered May 30, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree and menacing in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive terms of 3 1/2 to 7 years and 1 1/2 to 3 years concurrent with a term of 1 year, and judgment, same court and Justice, rendered October 11, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a concurrent term of 3 1/2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Deborah L. Morse, for respondent.

Natalie Rea, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


The hypothetical question posed to the People's expert witness could not have affected the verdict and did not deprive defendant of a fair trial.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Ellis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 20, 2000
274 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Ellis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. BORIS ELLIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 20, 2000

Citations

274 A.D.2d 338 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Instead, the court can rely, in part, upon the previous rulings as an aid in determining the acceptability of…

People v. Smith

Instead, the Court can rely, in part, upon the previous rulings as an aid in determining the acceptability of…