Opinion
June 3, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, John A.K. Bradley, J., Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.
Defendant's suppression motion was appropriately denied. Since there is no ground to find the testimony of the police witnesses "patently tailored to nullify constitutional objections" (People v. Miret-Gonzalez, 159 A.D.2d 647, 649, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 739), it was for the hearing court to resolve any question of credibility and its resolution will not be disturbed on appeal (see, People v. Smith, 77 A.D.2d 544, 545-546).
The addition of one year to the minimum sentence to which defendant had agreed at plea, in light of defendant's intentional falsification designed to conceal his substantial criminal record in South Carolina, was not, in view of the opportunity given and declined to withdraw the plea, an abuse of discretion (see, People v. Walker, 187 A.D.2d 909, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 796).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Milonas, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.