From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Elkhoja

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 26, 2003
658 N.W.2d 153 (Mich. 2003)

Opinion

No. 122282 (87) (88).

March 26, 2003.


SC: 122282, COA: 224126, Washtenaw CC: 99-012310-FC

On order of the Court, the motion to dismiss is treated as a motion for reconsideration of the order granting leave to appeal. On reconsideration, we VACATE the order of December 10, 2002, and, for the reasons articulated by the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, we VACATE that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion that discusses discovery of criminal history record information found on the law enforcement information network (LEIN). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED because we are no longer persuaded the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for a time extension is DENIED as moot.

Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., dissent and state as follows:

As this matter is moot, we would simply dismiss this application. We dissent from the vacation of the Court of Appeals order.


Summaries of

People v. Elkhoja

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 26, 2003
658 N.W.2d 153 (Mich. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Elkhoja

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff, and CITY OF ANN ARBOR…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Mar 26, 2003

Citations

658 N.W.2d 153 (Mich. 2003)

Citing Cases

People v. Sluck

The prosecution also argued that, due to the broad nature of his request, which was not limited to admissible…

Napier v. Cnty. of Washtenaw

Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 28.214(2)-(3). In support of their position, Defendants look to People v. Elkhoja,…