From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. El Amin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 16, 1990

Appeal from the Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant's contention that the People failed to present legally sufficient evidence that he possessed forged instruments with knowledge that they were forged. Knowledge of forgery may be established by circumstantial evidence of a defendant's conduct and the surrounding events (People v Johnson, 65 N.Y.2d 556, 561; see also, People v Von Werne, 41 N.Y.2d 584, 590). Evidence that defendant had unrestricted access to the bank withdrawal forms, lost passbook affidavits and power of attorney forms; that the person whose signature appeared on the documents was absent from the State when the documents were signed; and that defendant misrepresented that the signer's signature appeared different because she was an invalid and in poor health was legally sufficient to support the inference that defendant knew the instruments were forged (see, People v Johnson, supra, at 562-563).


Summaries of

People v. El Amin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 16, 1990
159 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. El Amin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRED EL AMIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 748

Citing Cases

People v. Mathis Nurture Home Health Serv

The jury could also reasonably reach the same conclusions with regard to the forged physical examination…