From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ehrhardt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

245

March 15, 2002.

Appeal from a judgment of Monroe County Court (Connell, J.), entered September 13, 2000, convicting defendant of a violation of probation.

Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender, Rochester (Timothy P. Donaher of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Howard R. Relin, District Attorney, Rochester (Kelly Christine Wolford of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, SCUDDER, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the period of post-release supervision to a period of three years and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant admitted to a violation of probation and was sentenced to a three-year determinate term of incarceration and a five-year period of post-release supervision upon the underlying conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02). As the People correctly concede, the sentence is illegal insofar as it imposes a five-year period of post-release supervision ( see, Penal Law § 70.45). We therefore modify the judgment by reducing the period of post-release supervision to a period of three years ( see, e.g., People v. Rawlinson, 280 A.D.2d 943, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 833; People v. Wingate, 225 A.D.2d 1085, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 970), the maximum allowed. The sentence as modified is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Ehrhardt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Ehrhardt

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-respondent, v. MICHAEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 15, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

People v. Keith

We note, however, that the sentence imposed in appeal No. 2 is illegal insofar as the court imposed a…

People v. Gibson

Finally, we conclude that the sentence is illegal insofar as it includes a two-year period of postrelease…