From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Edwards

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2015
129 A.D.3d 1499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

645 KA 14-00512

06-12-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter M. EDWARDS, Defendant–Appellant.

David J. Farrugia, Public Defender, Lockport (Mary–Jean Bowman of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Laura T. Bittner of Counsel), for Respondent.


David J. Farrugia, Public Defender, Lockport (Mary–Jean Bowman of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.

Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Laura T. Bittner of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DeJOSEPH, JJ.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30[2] ) and intimidating a victim or witness in the second degree (§ 215.16[2] ), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence with respect to those crimes. Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of those crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we reject that contention (see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ; People v. Gibson, 89 A.D.3d 1514, 1515, 934 N.Y.S.2d 633, lv. denied 18 N.Y.3d 924, 942 N.Y.S.2d 463, 965 N.E.2d 965 ). Defendant's further contention that the verdict is inconsistent because he was convicted of burglary in the first degree but was acquitted of the count of assault in the third degree related to that same incident is not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict before the jury was discharged (see People v. Bartlett, 89 A.D.3d 1453, 1454, 933 N.Y.S.2d 145, lv. denied 18 N.Y.3d 881, 939 N.Y.S.2d 751, 963 N.E.2d 128 ), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[6][a] ). We reject defendant's challenge to the severity of the sentence.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Edwards

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2015
129 A.D.3d 1499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter M. EDWARDS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 12, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 1499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
10 N.Y.S.3d 379
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 4991

Citing Cases

People v. Edwards

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 4th Dept: 129 AD3d 1499 (Niagara)…

People v. Dinant

Before trial, the court reduced the greater counts of criminal mischief and criminal possession of a weapon…