Opinion
645 KA 14-00512
06-12-2015
David J. Farrugia, Public Defender, Lockport (Mary–Jean Bowman of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Laura T. Bittner of Counsel), for Respondent.
David J. Farrugia, Public Defender, Lockport (Mary–Jean Bowman of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.
Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Laura T. Bittner of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DeJOSEPH, JJ.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM:On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30[2] ) and intimidating a victim or witness in the second degree (§ 215.16[2] ), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence with respect to those crimes. Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of those crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we reject that contention (see generally People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ; People v. Gibson, 89 A.D.3d 1514, 1515, 934 N.Y.S.2d 633, lv. denied 18 N.Y.3d 924, 942 N.Y.S.2d 463, 965 N.E.2d 965 ). Defendant's further contention that the verdict is inconsistent because he was convicted of burglary in the first degree but was acquitted of the count of assault in the third degree related to that same incident is not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict before the jury was discharged (see People v. Bartlett, 89 A.D.3d 1453, 1454, 933 N.Y.S.2d 145, lv. denied 18 N.Y.3d 881, 939 N.Y.S.2d 751, 963 N.E.2d 128 ), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15[6][a] ). We reject defendant's challenge to the severity of the sentence.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.