Opinion
Submitted September 7, 1999
October 25, 1999
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Resolutions of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see,People v. Gaimari, 176 N.Y. 84, 94 ). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v. Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88 ). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15[5]).
The defendant's contention which respect to the trial court's marshaling of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05[2]). In any event, the trial court marshaled the evidence in a fair and even-handed manner (see, People v. Christodoulou, 245 A.D.2d 386 ).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
BRACKEN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY, and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.