From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Echauri

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Sep 23, 2019
B296610 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 23, 2019)

Opinion

B296610

09-23-2019

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MATTHEW FAY ECHAURI, Defendant and Appellant.

Michele A. Douglass, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GA100703) APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael Villalobos, Judge. Affirmed. Michele A. Douglass, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

____________________

Defendant Matthew Fay Echauri stabbed his former girlfriend 33 times after she refused his request that she not testify against him in a domestic violence case. A jury convicted Echauri of willful, deliberate, and premeditated attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 664), in which he personally used a deadly weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)) and inflicted great bodily injury under circumstances involving domestic violence (§ 12022.7, subd. (e)). The jury also convicted Echauri on two counts of dissuading a witness (§ 136.1, subd. (c)(1)) and one count of mayhem (§ 203).

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

The trial court sentenced Echauri to life with the possibility of parole plus six years for the attempted murder. It sentenced him to four years on one of the counts of dissuading a witness. It stayed sentence on the other count of dissuading a witness and on the mayhem count pursuant to section 654. In addition to the standard fines and assessments, per stipulation the trial court ordered Echauri to pay $10,781.80 to the California Victim Compensation Restitution Fund.

BACKGROUND

I. Prosecution Evidence

Echauri began dating Melissa M. in December 2015, while she was still in high school; Echauri was in his early 20's.

In April 2016, Echauri was driving Melissa in his car in Orange County. He became upset over a phone call Melissa received. He hit her in the face with his fist and took away her phone. He lost control of his car and hit another vehicle, causing additional injuries to Melissa. The police responded to the scene of the accident, and Melissa told them what had happened.

In October 2016, when Melissa tried to leave Echauri's home Echauri pushed her to the ground; he hit and kicked her. Melissa managed to leave and asked a neighbor to call the police. A few days later, Melissa told the police she did not want to prosecute Echauri.

Melissa broke up with Echauri in late February 2017, although she remained in contact with him. On March 2, 2017, Melissa received a letter stating that a criminal case had been filed against Echauri in Orange County, and a restraining order had been issued; the letter told Melissa she was to have no communication with Echauri and she would have to appear in court. That afternoon, Echauri, who had also received a letter regarding the case, texted Melissa; he wanted to see the letter she had received. Melissa wanted to obey the restraining order but eventually agreed to allow Echauri to come to her house to see the letter.

At her home, Melissa showed Echauri the letter she had received. He told her to testify that he had not hit her and to try to get the restraining order lifted. Melissa told Echauri to let the court handle the matter. He became upset and began calling her names. Melissa's mother ordered Echauri out of the house. Echauri asked Melissa to come with him to talk. She agreed in order to get him out of the house.

Echauri continued to tell Melissa to testify that he had not hit her and to get the restraining order lifted. Melissa again told him to leave her alone and let the court handle the matter. As she turned to go back to her house, Melissa felt Echauri hit her on the back of the head. Melissa started to hit back and then realized she "was all wet and covered in blood." She was hitting and kicking Echauri, while he continued stabbing her in the head, neck, and back. Melissa recognized the knife that Echauri used to stab her as one he kept in a box in his closet; she had never seen him carry it on his person.

Melissa ran to a neighbor's house and banged on the door to get help, but no one answered. Echauri followed her, grabbed her by the hair and threw her to the ground. He got on top of her and continued stabbing her. He then got up and began to walk away. However, he returned and then stabbed her in the head and face. Echauri said nothing while he was stabbing Melissa; Melissa was screaming.

The attack was filmed by the neighbor's security system.

Melissa's mother came out of her house, and Echauri ran away. Melissa got up and ran to her mother. Some people came over to help stop the bleeding, and someone called 911. Sheriff's deputies arrived at the scene, as did an ambulance. Melissa was taken to the hospital.

Melissa suffered 33 stab wounds, one puncturing a lung. Another severed a tendon in her arm, requiring surgical repair. As of the time of trial, Melissa had not regained full use of her hand, and she had visible scars on her face and body.

That evening, Echauri walked into a local bar and ordered a drink. The bartender noticed that Echauri had foam around his mouth and appeared to be "on something." He refused to serve Echauri. Echauri told the bartender he was in trouble and had to get out of town; he said he had "shanked" his girlfriend with a switchblade. The bartender called the police.

The police arrived and took Echauri into custody. They then turned him over to the sheriff's department. The officers observed Echauri to be calm and cooperative; he did not appear to need to be placed on a psychiatric hold.

On March 4, 2017 while Melissa was still in the hospital, she received a call from the county jail, asking if she would accept a collect call. In place of the caller's name, she heard Echauri say, "If you say anything, I swear I will . . . ." Melissa hung up the phone. Her phone rang a second time; she did not answer it. Phone records from the county jail showed that Echauri made two phone calls that morning.

II. Defense Evidence

While Echauri was at the inmate reception center at the county jail, nurses requested that he receive a mental health examination. A psychiatric nurse met with Echauri on March 4, 2017. She noted that Echauri had received mental health treatment in 2011 and 2013 but was not prescribed medication; Echauri had been diagnosed with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Echauri told the nurse he had been prescribed a blue pill for anxiety and nervousness, and he occasionally used marijuana; he denied substance abuse.

A psychiatrist working at the jail evaluated Echauri on March 14. He diagnosed Echauri with substance abuse disorder based on Echauri's history of uncontrolled use of substances.

The psychiatrist did not note the specific substances that Echauri abused. --------

Forensic Psychiatrist Gordon Plotkin reviewed Echauri's medical records and case documents, including interviews of witnesses and Echauri's family members. He also met with Echauri and evaluated him. He concluded that Echauri suffered from substance abuse disorder. Echauri mainly abused marijuana, and secondarily alcohol. Echauri also abused cocaine, methamphetamine, ecstasy, and Xanax.

Dr. Plotkin noted that Echauri's records showed that he suffered from anxiety and depression; Xanax is an antianxiety drug which comes in various colors, including blue. Xanax can cause sedation and even blackouts, but it does not produce obvious symptoms such as slurred speech or unsteadiness, the way alcohol does. Additionally, Xanax has a very short half-life, so its effects and presence in the bloodstream would be greatly reduced within four hours.

In Dr. Plotkin's opinion, Echauri's actions at the time he stabbed Melissa and thereafter were not inconsistent with a conclusion that Echauri was under the influence of Xanax.

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Echauri on this appeal. After review of the record, Echauri's counsel filed an opening brief requesting this court to independently review the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441. On July 18, 2019, we sent a letter to Echauri, advising him that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. We received no response.

We have examined the entire record. We are satisfied that no arguable legal issues exist and that Echauri's counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities. By virtue of counsel's compliance with the Wende procedure and our review of the record, we are satisfied that Echauri received adequate and effective appellate review of the order entered against him in this case. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441; accord, People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109-110.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

JOHNSON, J. We concur:

ROTHSCHILD, P. J.

BENDIX, J.


Summaries of

People v. Echauri

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Sep 23, 2019
B296610 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 23, 2019)
Case details for

People v. Echauri

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MATTHEW FAY ECHAURI, Defendant…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE

Date published: Sep 23, 2019

Citations

B296610 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 23, 2019)