From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Eason

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1977
59 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

August 8, 1977


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 10, 1974, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree, criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth and sixth degrees, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the convictions of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth and sixth degrees and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, and the sentences imposed thereon, and the said counts are dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Under the facts of this case, defendant could not have committed the crimes of selling a dangerous drug or a controlled substance without also having committed the several possessory crimes as well. Accordingly, the guilty verdict on the sale counts requires dismissal of the several possession counts (see CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]; People v Lugo, 53 A.D.2d 650; People v Grier, 37 N.Y.2d 847). Martuscello, J.P., Margett, Suozzi and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Eason

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1977
59 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Eason

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL EASON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 8, 1977

Citations

59 A.D.2d 560 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

People v. Pettus

The three counts in the indictment were based upon a single sale to an undercover officer. On these facts,…

People v. Bucci

As so modified, judgment affirmed. The possession count is an inclusory concurrent count of that charging…