Opinion
No. 132284.
December 15, 2006.
Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 267976.
Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal December 15, 2006.
The motion for immediate consideration is granted. We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the defendant has standing to challenge evidence seized in violation of MCL 767A.1 et seq. and, if so, whether the violation of that statutory provision authorizes exclusion of the evidence, in light of People v Hawkins, 468 Mich 488, 507 (2003), and People v Anstey, 476 Mich 436, 448 (2006). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatements of the arguments made in their application papers. The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.