From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Durham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 21, 2000.

December 12, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kohm, J.), rendered November 14, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Camilla B. Taylor of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, Brian J. Stavrides, and Patricia Malloy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The alleged errors claimed by the defendant are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or were cured by the trial court's prompt instructions to the jury.

The defendant's sentence was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Durham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 12, 2000
278 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Durham

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. ALFRED DURHAM, APPELLANT. (IND. NO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 605