From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Durham

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 3, 1970
24 Mich. App. 358 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Docket No. 8,490.

Decided June 3, 1970.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, Samuel H. Olsen, J. Submitted Division 1 May 5, 1970, at Lansing. (Docket No. 8,490.) Decided June 3, 1970.

Carroll Durham was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of attempted sale of a narcotic drug. Defendant appeals. People's motion to affirm granted.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Armand D. Bove, for defendant on appeal.

Before: QUINN, P.J., and McGREGOR and BRONSON, JJ.


By his plea of guilty, defendant was convicted of attempted sale of a narcotic drug in violation of MCLA § 335.152 (Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.1122) and MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287). He appealed as of right. The people have filed a motion to affirm the conviction. GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

On appeal, defendant contends that the lower court failed to examine him sufficiently to establish the crime and his participation therein. See People v. Barrows (1959), 358 Mich. 267, 272 and People v. Perine (1967), 7 Mich. App. 292.

Our review of the record satisfies us that the court's examination of defendant was sufficient.

Motion to affirm is granted.


Summaries of

People v. Durham

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jun 3, 1970
24 Mich. App. 358 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

People v. Durham

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. DURHAM

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 3, 1970

Citations

24 Mich. App. 358 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
180 N.W.2d 290