From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dupont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

1998-05269.

Decided May 24, 2004.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated May 21, 2001 ( People v. Dupont, 283 A.D.2d 587), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 19, 1998.

Dominic Dupont, Stormville, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Caroline R. Donhauser of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, NANCY E. SMITH, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745; People v. Stultz, N.Y.2d [May 4, 2004]).

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, SMITH and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dupont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 2004
7 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Dupont

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. DOMINIC DUPONT, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
776 N.Y.S.2d 882