From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dunn, Gentile

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1949
84 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1949)

Opinion

Reargued December 1, 1948.

Decided February 24, 1949

Appeal from the Court of General Sessions of New York County, DONNELLAN, J.

Bernard Hershkopf and Hyman Barshay for John M. Dunn, appellant.

Harry G. Anderson and Vincent Tese for Daniel Gentile, appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Whitman Knapp and William Hoppen of counsel), for respondent.


Upon reargument of appeals by appellants John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile: Judgments of conviction affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY and FULD, JJ. DESMOND and DYE, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the ground that the newly discovered evidence could well change the result if presented to a jury and, accordingly, should be so presented.


Summaries of

People v. Dunn, Gentile

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1949
84 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1949)
Case details for

People v. Dunn, Gentile

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN M. DUNN and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 24, 1949

Citations

84 N.E.2d 635 (N.Y. 1949)
84 N.E.2d 635