From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dunlavey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 8, 1991
171 A.D.2d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

March 8, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495), defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146-147), and his sentence is not excessive. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting defense counsel's direct examination of Linda MacBeth because her proposed testimony was not relevant. Defendant's constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied (see, People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 445).


Summaries of

People v. Dunlavey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 8, 1991
171 A.D.2d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Dunlavey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES DUNLAVEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1991

Citations

171 A.D.2d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
569 N.Y.S.2d 233