From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dumas

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
May 10, 1939
32 Cal.App.2d 609 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)

Opinion

Docket No. 383.

May 10, 1939.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. O.K. Morton, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Willis O. Tyler for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and Burdette J. Daniels, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


The clerk's transcript herein was filed on March 8, 1939, and the reporter's transcript on April 10, 1939. [1] No appearance has been made and no brief filed by or on behalf of the appellant, and no extension of time for the filing of such a brief has been requested or granted. The cause was regularly calendared for May 9, 1939, at which time the attorney-general moved for an affirmance of the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code. The motion is granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Dumas

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
May 10, 1939
32 Cal.App.2d 609 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
Case details for

People v. Dumas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JOHN K. DUMAS, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: May 10, 1939

Citations

32 Cal.App.2d 609 (Cal. Ct. App. 1939)
90 P.2d 344

Citing Cases

Dunham v. Stitzberg

The probate courts in New Mexico have no jurisdiction to try or determine title to either real or personal…