From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dudley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 1989
156 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 18, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The uncontroverted testimony at the hearing established that the telephone call in question was never memorialized. Thus, the defendant is not entitled to a reversal of the judgment of conviction on the theory that material to which she was entitled under People v Rosario (supra) was withheld from her.

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dudley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 18, 1989
156 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Dudley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARLENE DUDLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
549 N.Y.S.2d 89

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

The tape recording of Police Officer Mosely reading from his notes was not considered Rosario material. In…

People v. Melendez

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People's failure to…