From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Duarte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 2002
300 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1886

December 19, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Stackhouse, J.), rendered June 16, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 8 years to life on the second-degree possession conviction and 4½ to 13½ years on each of the third-degree possession convictions, consecutive to a term of 7 to 21 years on the sale conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Sheryl Feldman, for respondent.

Jeffrey Dellheim, for defendant-appellant.

Before: ANDRIAS, J.P., ROSENBERGER, MARLOW, GONZALEZ, JJ.


Defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence concerning the transaction of December 4, 1996 is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interests of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility, including its rejection of defendant's testimony. The credible evidence established that defendant had both the intent and ability to proceed with the sale of cocaine to the undercover officers (see People v. Samuels, 99 N.Y.2d 20, 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3444; People v. Mike, 92 N.Y.2d 996, 998). We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence.

The court properly granted the prosecutor's application made pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79). The record supports the court's determination that defendant's explanation for striking the prospective juror at issue was pretextual, in that defendant declined to challenge similarly situated panelists. This credibility-based finding is entitled to great deference (see People v. Hernandez, 75 N.Y.2d 350, affd 500 U.S. 352).

We find no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Duarte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 19, 2002
300 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Duarte

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOSE DUARTE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 734