From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Drinkwine

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 21, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-21-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Wayne DRINKWINE, appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr., of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Jacob Wells on the memorandum), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., New York, NY (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Jacob Wells on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed August 8, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Delgado, 80 N.Y.2d 780, 587 N.Y.S.2d 271, 599 N.E.2d 675 ; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 86–87, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, COHEN, LaSALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Drinkwine

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 21, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Drinkwine

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Wayne DRINKWINE, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 21, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1103 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6098
37 N.Y.S.3d 711