From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Drew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1989
147 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

February 23, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Covington, J.).


On appeal, defendant contends that he was illegally sentenced as an armed felon. We agree. An "armed felony" is defined in CPL 1.20 (41) as:

"[A]ny violent felony offense defined in section 70.02 of the penal law that includes as an element either:

"(a) possession, being armed with or causing serious physical injury by means of a deadly weapon, if the weapon is a loaded weapon from which a shot, readily capable of producing death or other serious injury may be discharged; or

"(b) display of what appears to be a pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or other firearm."

Although attempted murder in the second degree and the theory of first degree robbery of which defendant was convicted are both class B violent felonies, neither crime satisfies the second requirement of the definition of an armed felony because their elements do not include either possession of a deadly weapon or display of a firearm. In that regard, the fact that guns were involved in both crimes to which defendant pleaded guilty is irrelevant to the legal analysis. (See, People v Thorpe, 129 A.D.2d 822, 823; People v Roman, 114 A.D.2d 809, 810, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 889.)

Consequently, since neither crime is an armed felony offense as defined by CPL 1.20 (41), the imposition of a minimum term of imprisonment of one half the maximum term imposed was unauthorized. (See, Penal Law § 70.02.) Rather, the minimum period of imprisonment under an indeterminate sentence for a violent felony offense, not otherwise designated as an armed felony offense, must be fixed at one third of the maximum term imposed. (See, Penal Law § 70.02; People v Battles, 117 A.D.2d 509, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 665; People v Rivera, 111 A.D.2d 71, 72; People v Lawrence, 97 A.D.2d 718, affd 64 N.Y.2d 200.)

Accordingly, the judgment is modified to the extent of reducing the minimum term of each sentence to six years, and is otherwise affirmed.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Carro, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Drew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 1989
147 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Drew

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WAYNE DREW, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 411 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
538 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

People v. Walker

The sentences imposed for robbery in the first degree under the tenth count (Penal Law § 160.15) and robbery…

People v. Ross

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Covington, J.). Defendant was sentenced to an…