People v. Dozier

2 Citing cases

  1. People v. Santiago

    280 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 2 times

    The defendant's claims are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662) or waived (see, People v. Hayes, 239 A.D.2d 358). In any event, there is nothing in the defendant's factual allocution which casts doubt upon her guilt, negates an essential element of the crime, or suggests a legitimate defense (see, People v. Dozier, 221 A.D.2d 655).

  2. People v. Williams

    226 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)   Cited 11 times

    05; People v. Liccione, 50 N.Y.2d 850; People v. Bunbury, 218 A.D.2d 747) and in any event, is without merit. The defendant's appearance and demeanor on the videotape belies his claim that he was psychologically or physically coerced by lack of food or water into making the statements ( see, People v. Dozier, 221 A.D.2d 655; People v Turner, 200 A.D.2d 603, 604). Furthermore, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt.