From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PEOPLE v. DOYL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1997
242 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 25, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J., at hearing; Bernard Fried, J., at jury trial and sentence).


In light of the information transmitted by the undercover officer, who made a drug purchase, to the arresting officer, which transmission included a detailed description of the perpetrators of the sale, there was probable cause for the arrest ( People v. Petralia, 62 N.Y.2d 47, 51-52, cert denied 469 U.S. 852).

Defendant's disagreement with his attorney over trial strategy was not good cause for substitution of counsel and does not establish ineffective assistance of counsel ( see, People v. Sides, 75 N.Y.2d 822, 824; People v. Smith, 59 N.Y.2d 156, 165-166; People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

PEOPLE v. DOYL

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1997
242 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

PEOPLE v. DOYL

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN DOYL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 311