Opinion
February 16, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court did not err in denying that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony, as the evidence adduced established the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of suggestiveness of the identification procedures. Contrary to the defendant's contention, there was no evidence adduced at the suppression hearing that certain wanted posters issued more than one month before the lineup were still posted in the area of the precinct where the witnesses waited, or that any witness actually saw a wanted poster before viewing the lineup.
We have considered the remaining contention raised by the defendant and find it to be without merit. Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.