From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dottery

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 23, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1232 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-23

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Steven DOTTERY, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Gamaliel Marrero on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Gamaliel Marrero on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), imposed March 15, 2010, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

*908 ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645; People v. DeSimone, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, BELEN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dottery

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 23, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1232 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Dottery

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Steven DOTTERY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 23, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1232 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4024
943 N.Y.S.2d 907