From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dorsey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 3, 2017
154 A.D.3d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-03-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jaysen DORSEY, Defendant–Appellant.

Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kate Mollison of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondent.


Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kate Mollison of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered September 15, 2015,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

SWEENY, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, KAHN, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dorsey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 3, 2017
154 A.D.3d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Dorsey

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jaysen DORSEY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 3, 2017

Citations

154 A.D.3d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
60 N.Y.S.3d 818