From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dormann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 1943
265 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Opinion

January 25, 1943.

Appeal from County Court of Rockland County.


Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. There was ample credible evidence to justify the jury's verdict that the defendant was guilty of the offenses charged against him. The verdict eventuated after a long impartially conducted trial which was conspicuously free from error. We are constrained, however, to sustain the contention of the appellant that the trial court, in the period between the submission of the case to the jury and the return of their verdict, made observations to the jury of a prejudicial and coercive character, which, in effect, invaded the function of the jury in respect of the evidence the jury was obligated to believe or to credit. It may be that the court intended to give expression to thoughts that were not erroneous or prejudicial, but under circumstances of tension made an unhappy choice of language. We must consider, however, the possible effect of the erroneous statements as made, and may not ascribe to the court's language a meaning which, if so understood, would not have been erroneous. Order denying motion to set aside the appointment of Irving G. Kennedy as Special District Attorney, and to dismiss the indictment, affirmed. Close, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Dormann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 1943
265 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Case details for

People v. Dormann

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD C. DORMANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1943

Citations

265 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)

Citing Cases

People v. Dormann

That court, in reversing the judgment against the defendant Dormann, stated that there was ample credible…