From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Dorler

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1981
422 N.E.2d 818 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued March 31, 1981

Decided April 30, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, LEE TOWNE ADAMS, J.

Bruce K. Carpenter for appellant.

John T. Ward, District Attorney (Albert W. Foley of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Review of Raynor's trial testimony, including his readiness to there accept the accuracy of the version of the events he had tendered to the police and his earlier Grand Jury testimony, indicates that whether he was an accomplice of the defendant within the compass of CPL 60.22 (subd 2) was a question of fact. It, therefore, was error for the trial court to deny defendant's request that it charge the jury to that effect.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Dorler

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1981
422 N.E.2d 818 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Dorler

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM K. DORLER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 30, 1981

Citations

422 N.E.2d 818 (N.Y. 1981)
422 N.E.2d 818
440 N.Y.S.2d 173

Citing Cases

People v. Young

The defendant gave the witness a chain which had belonged to the victim. She later pawned it. The fact that…

People v. Vataj

A witness may be an accomplice for purposes of the corroboration statute if, according to the evidence, he…