Opinion
Docket Nos. 45405, 45406.
Decided December 16, 1980.
Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, David H. Sawyer, Prosecuting Attorney, and Carol S. Irons, Chief Appellate Attorney, for the people.
George S. Buth, for defendant on appeal.
Before: DANHOF, C.J., and BRONSON and CYNAR, JJ.
On March 1, 1979, defendant was convicted on his pleas of guilty of assault with intent to rob while armed, MCL 750.89; MSA 28.284, and prison escape, MCL 750.193; MSA 28.390. On April 4, 1979, he was sentenced to three years, four months to five years imprisonment on the escape conviction and 10 to 25 years imprisonment on the assault conviction, both to commence at the expiration of the term defendant was serving when he escaped. Defendant appeals as of right.
On appeal, defendant argues that he is entitled to resentencing because he was excluded from an in-chambers conference between the court and defendant's attorney prior to his sentencing hearing. Defendant claims that this exclusion deprived him of his constitutional and statutory right to be present at all critical stages of the proceedings.
We find no error. There is no requirement that a defendant be present during an in-chambers discussion with counsel regarding sentencing. People v Worden, 91 Mich. App. 666, 685; 284 N.W.2d 159 (1979), People v Dumas, 102 Mich. App. 196; 301 N.W.2d 849 (1980). See also People v Briggs, 94 Mich. App. 723, 727; 290 N.W.2d 66 (1980), lv gtd 408 Mich. 958 (1980). We note that the Michigan Supreme Court has granted leave and ordered this issue to be briefed in People v Pulley, 407 Mich. 946 (1979).
Affirmed.