In Doll, we noted in a special concurrence that Weber's comment that the defendant was a "rat in a maze" "served no other purpose than to arouse the passions of the jury."
Summary of this case from People v. Libberton2-02-564.
September 25, 2003.
Appeal from the Jo Daviess.
Disposition of Cases by Order Affirmed.
In Doll, we noted in a special concurrence that Weber's comment that the defendant was a "rat in a maze" "served no other purpose than to arouse the passions of the jury."
Summary of this case from People v. LibbertonFull title:People v. Doll
Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Date published: Sep 25, 2003
Time and again Glen Weber has crossed the line of permissible conduct. See People v. Slabaugh, 323 Ill. App.…