Opinion
April 8, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marano, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant's plea of guilty operated as a waiver of his claimed statutory right to dismissal of the indictment on the ground that the People were not ready for trial within the period prescribed by CPL 30.30 ( People v. Suarez, 55 N.Y.2d 940; People v. Galante, 91 A.D.2d 690). Moreover, no denial of defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial has been demonstrated ( see, People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442).
Defendant further contends that the court erred in accepting his guilty plea without making further inquiries upon his statements during the plea allocution. By failing to apply to the court of first instance to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, the defendant has not preserved any issue of law as to the sufficiency of the plea allocution ( People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Mattocks, 100 A.D.2d 944). In any event, the record discloses that the allocution was sufficient ( People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067).
We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson and O'Connor, JJ., concur.