Opinion
March 25, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Broomer, J.).
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the People satisfied their initial burden of establishing the reasonableness of the police conduct and the lack of any undue suggestiveness in the pretrial identification procedure ( see, People v Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, 335, cert denied 498 U.S. 833; cf., People v Jones, 157 A.D.2d 487). Since the defendant failed to similarly bear his burden of proving that the procedure was unduly suggestive, the Supreme Court properly denied the branch of his motion which was to suppress the identification testimony (see, People v Chipp, supra). Copertino, J.P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.